Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Mesquite Falling Behind

I made a trip to St. George this week, something I am loathe to do. 
While visiting our nearest neighbor, I was struck by something that bothered me. 
At the doctor's office my wife was visiting, I noticed that another office building was being built in the complex off Riverside Road.  As we traveled around the Utah city, I noticed other construction projects in full swing.
Also, on the way to that office, we went through a construction gauntlet on the interstate.  They were building another overpass between exits 4 and 6, and widening I-15. 
The rest of the country is facing round two of the recession, but St. George is booming and thriving.
Obviously, as a Mesquitian, I am jealous.
I began to ponder what makes St. George continue to grow while my beloved hometown is dying before my eyes.
It's tough to figure out.
Both towns have identical climates, meaning extremely hot in the spring, blisteringly hot in the summer, brutally hot in the fall, and sometimes downright pleasant during the brief winter.
St. George and Mesquite have similar LDS roots and continued strong church influences.
Each is located right on the interstate.  Both have nice golf courses.
The differences?
Well, to be honest, Mesquite is in Nevada, which means no state income taxes, very friendly state tax structures for businesses, and a right-to-work state which means unions have trouble getting a toe hold (or another way of putting it, workers can be and are abused, grotesquely underpaid, kicked around, and spit on, and nobody steps up for them).
Mesquite is closer to Nevada's largest metropolitan center of Las Vegas than St. George is to Salt Lake, Utah's big city.
Mesquite is newer and fresher, with excellent infrastructure.  St. George is older, with more rundown areas and more low-income housing, and roads that need some help in places.
Mesquite is open 24 hours a day, with casinos, liberal liquor laws, and used to be focused on tourism.  St. George has some tourism, most of it revolving around their marathon and senior games, and welcomes visitors so long as they are in bed by 9 p.m.  They have one bar, one liquor store, and the beer they serve has an alcohol content of 3.2%.  I've had chocolate milk that had more kick to it.
But here are a few things in St. George's favor.
First, they have a shiny new airport.  The one they used to have was barely bigger than Mesquite's current muni plane place, but Utahns had enough vision 10 years ago to start the ball rolling on a bigger place.  Since then, they've added two interstate exits, several nearby commercial and residential projects, and opened up a whole new section of town.
I suspect Mesquite will start getting serious about an airport just about the time intercontinental space travel becomes the norm.
However, one of the biggest immediate differences is attitude toward business.
If you're a carpetbagger from somewhere else with big dreams, no money, and an attractive sales pitch, Mesquite is your destination.  For example, we rolled out the red carpet, sold land at fire sale prices, accepted post-dated checks, and heralded an unlikely amateur sports park that even little old Hurricane, Utah was too smart to bite into.
But if you're a small business owner, trying to open a store, introduce a new service, or build a little water park with batting cages and a paintball facility in Mesquite, forget it.  You'll see more hurdles than an Olympic decathlon sprinter.
A few months ago, I wrote a story that exemplified the problem.  A woman wanted to keep her used furniture store going, but the city insisted she complete an intrusive 13-page business license application that was the equivalent of a discount proctology exam.  Oh, and about $600 a year in license fees plus a one-time fee of $145.
To open the same store in St. George, it required a one-page application, and a $50 annual fee.
The Mesquite application process has been improved a little bit, but what hasn't gotten much better yet is the inherent anti-business attitude expressed by City Hall for years with high license fees and cumbersome application and approval processes.
Hopefully the new city council will fix some of this, particularly since the current lineup includes a mayor whose full time job is doing marketing and expanding services for the local phone company; a former casino executive; the head broker at an extremely successful real estate company; and a Mesquite native who owns several commercial properties and businesses.
Also, with the departure of Tim Hacker and Catherine Lorbeer, businesses should start feeling a little more warm and fuzzy when visiting City Hall.
Of course, we still need the Chamber of Commerce to step up and become as aggressive in recruiting and helping new businesses as they are in throwing drinking parties and going bowling.  Thankfully, the organization is worlds ahead of where it was two years ago, but it still needs a lot of work and some new vision in which "gaming" isn't a dirty word.  Someone also needs to give them a map that shows the world isn't flat beyond exits 120 and 122, and that it's okay to market and promote Mesquite beyond our borders.
Business is essential for a growing city, even if the community's number one cash crop is retirees.
One more thing:  when a business comes to town, we the people need to support it.  A skating rink is closing because nobody showed up, and the city wouldn't help rework a mostly-empty bus route out to the facility.  A certain resurrected restaurant on Mesquite Boulevard frequently serves less than a half-dozen people for lunch.  A longtime furniture store recently closed down because people would rather go to Las Vegas and St. George to save $50 on a living room set.  If we continue to take our money out of town, it won't be long before we won't have a town.
We don't want to be St. George, any more than we want to be Las Vegas.  But when other areas are thriving and recovering while Mesquite continues to die a slow death, it's time to wake up, look around, figure out what's wrong, and start the hard work of fixing it.

5 comments:

  1. Morris, it seems to me that you were one of the people looking for tar and feathers for former City Councilman Bill Wells when he was pushing for the airport. Mesquite always seems like that town that is four steps behind. Somewhere, someone in Mesquite is saying "We don't need traffic lights."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, I was in complete agreement with Bill Wells on the airport issue. He knew the value of an airport to this community, and fought a valiant battle to bring it here. He was right then, and I frequently said so.

    Where he earned the "tar and feather" sauna was when he stated publicly "I'm only going to be a one term councilman, I won't run for re-election," then flipped a few months before filing day and decided to run again. Not even a popular president like George Bush (Sr) can survive such a monumental flip-flop.

    He further fell out of favor (with me at least) when instead of standing tall as the courageous military hero I know him to be, he caved and became just another Holecheck "yes man" during his last year on council, consistenly part of the 5-0 parade (including approval of Desert Falls and an increase in business license fees), and was a BIG proponent of "don't say anything bad about the community, don't engage in negativity, we have to put up a united front, we need to pretend everything is hunky dory." Also, his opposition to free speech by his constituents who expressed opinions online, who he derisively referred to as "bloggers," was deplorable in my eyes.

    That said, even with our differences, I STILL believe Bill Wells is a man of integrity, a courageous man, and a patriot. He served his country with honor, served his community with passion, and is actually a lot of fun to hang around away from the Mesquite City Council dais.

    Hope that helps clear things up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Since I was the subject of the comments section in your article, "
    Mesquite is falling behind", I felt I should respond.

    I flip-flopped because I was a supporter of the airport. The project
    was dragging out longer than I had expected when I ran the first time
    and I felt I should stay the course to see it through. As it turned
    out "flip-flop" dominated the campaign. Also, voters had lost interest
    in the airport.

    As for being a Holecheck suporter, we did agee on a lot of issues. I
    wanted to see the city grow and unfortunately, due to the economy,
    they all failed. Susan was not a supporter of mine. It was very
    obvious she supported Karl and Bubba during the election. How often
    did you see the two of them with her at events minus me?

    You know I am a supporter of free speech. What I did not support was
    someone making personal vicious comments and non-factual statements
    and not having the balls to put their name to them.

    Life after public service is good. I am currently in Vancouver, BC
    starting a western Canadian trip.

    Bill Wells

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why I am leaving Mesquite: It only offers minimum wage jobs, unless you work for the city, which is threatening lay-offs and has a hiring freeze. Similarly, as my children leave the house, there is no work for them. It's not like they can go get their education and return to this town and make a living that will enable them to raise a family. If you're in Mesquite and have money, you had the money before you came here (unless you're one of the good ol' boys who made their money the old fashioned way - dirty deals at the taxpayers' expense- Mr. Hardy). The "hospital" provides sub-standard medical care and if you dare to say that out loud people shush you because you might scare the retirees off. There is no shopping that appeals to me - no bookstore, no clothing store that carries any real selection. And the politics are very literally killing the town. To all those who will post "good riddance" and "there's nothing wrong with Mesquite," you are the No. 1 reason. You can't fix what you don't acknowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe the article about the mean streak in Mesquite was irresponsible and a true case of the pot calling the kettle black. The article was blatantly mean spirited, biased and and unfair depiction of our town. Mesquite is a microcosm of the dirty politics taking place across our country. The CNN article did not note that the "mean" politicians and insiders referred to were themselves subjected on a regular basis to an unrelenting barrage of biased(in my opinion) negativity in the MLN. Furthermore the comments to these articles were even more hateful and regularly referred to the mayor by sexist and disrespectful names. The other council members fared little better. I'm not arguing their truth, but do take great exception to their tone. I strongly believe in the right to express opposition but I also believe in civility. There were times I agreed and times I disagreed but I always deplored the the fact that the positive side of these highly disliked elected officials was most always ignored.
    If political meanness is viewed by some as as the root cause of Donna's decision then how do they explain that Susan Holecheck under the same kind of criticism and scrutiny didn't kill her husband and herself? Instead of understanding that Donna was emotionally unstable and needed help, people chose to blame the mayor who was obliged to investigate Donna's $94 mistake. Had the situation been reversed and an irregularity been found in Susan's expenses, I have no doubt that Donna's camp and the news would have jumped on it. Unfortunatly, politics IS a dirty business and no place for those who are thin skinned.
    In the big picture this was a minor incident and Donna's political career would have survived the fallout. How this incident could be construed as the cause and justification of Donna shooting her innocent husband and herself is difficult to understand. When her friends say he wouldn't have wanted to go on without her were they thinking of his two daughters? I sympathize with the grief of their families and friends over their loss. Blaming others for her tragic actions and overlooking that she had many rational paths she could have chosen instead speaks volumes. She and Bill were much loved and sadly in times of grief people want to lash out. As a community we were all hurt by her actions and we do not deserve to be nationally singled out as having a mean streak when tragedy strikes.

    ReplyDelete